"We spent a lot of dev hours on little things; nowadays we’re used to scrolling through sites super fast, but we wanted to reward slowing down and exploring."Whiteboard
Q: Tell us about your initial moodboard, wireframe, or prototype. How did things change throughout the process?
A: Our brand is very type-driven — Cambon is a gorgeous serif and Good Sans is quirky. They pair beautifully and there’s always some interesting tension when they’re combined. So, when we were establishing our creative direction, we really wanted to push into more editorial concepts, highlight beautiful media and reference some of the compositional cues of the work of David Hockney and the broader world of photographic collage.Q: What influenced your chosen technical approach, and how did it go beyond past methods?
A: We spent a lot of dev hours on little things; nowadays we’re used to scrolling through sites super fast, but we wanted to reward slowing down and exploring. That required more attention to detail, a break from a more typical design system-forward approach — and a more section-specific effort towards interaction design, especially in the easter eggs in the first few sections. It’s okay if you miss them, but it’s magic if you don’t.When did you experience a breakthrough or an "a-ha" moment during this project?
The emphasis of a slower, more exploratory design language was a significant “a-ha” moment for us; previous iterations heavily emphasized action-oriented language and clear, direct calls to action, which didn’t connect well with our perspective and culture. Along the way, we also landed on the “for a brighter future” language that’s used to frame our featured work; a constant reminder that design and copywriting are always connected.